Legal Opinion

State v. Peek

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1996No. C-950411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Presiding Judge.

In a single assignment of error, defendant-appellant, Jason Peek, appeals from the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas convicting him of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (R.C. 2913.03), a misdemeanor of the first degree, following his plea of no contest to an indictment which charged him with receiving a stolen motor vehicle (R.C. 2913.51[A]), a felony of the third degree.

Peek contends that the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle is not a lesser included offense of receiving a stolen motor vehicle. Accordingly, he contends that he must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Leis v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. RaderOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HartmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. HairstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API