State v. Hairston
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rocco, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Charles C. Hairston appeals from his conviction on two counts of corruption of a minor, R.C. 2907.04, contending that his convictions were both against the manifest weight of the evidence and also improper in that they are not lesser included offenses of the ones for which he was originally indicted, viz., rape and gross sexual imposition. This court has examined the record and finds that only one of appellant’s convictions must be reversed, since the crime of corruption of a minor is an offense of inferior degree to the charge of rape; however, it is neither…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Easley, 07ap-578 (2-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. RiveraOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HairstonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011