Legal Opinion

Yarborough v. Peoples National Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1931No. 13253PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice; Cothran.

There appears to be no controversy over the facts of this case, which are as follows :

In 1907 W. A. Yarborough took out a policy of insurance in the Southeastern Pife Insurance Company for $1,000.00, upon his life, payable in the event of his death to his wife, the plaintiff, Susie B. Yarborough, if living, otherwise to his 'personal representative; the policy was upon what is termed the tontine plan, and provided that, if the insured survived the tontine period of twenty years, he should be entitled to elect one of several options…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Miller v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Gifford v. GiffordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laws v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Carroll v. South Carolina Nat. BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Bohlig v. First National Bank in WadenaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. John Gordon Morgan v. E. J. Evans CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API