Legal Opinion
Carroll v. South Carolina Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 10, 1947No. 16021PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OxnEr, J.:
This action was brought to recover from the 'South Carolina National Bank (Columbia branch) the amount of a check drawn on her account by the plaintiff, a •depositor, which the bank paid and charged against the plaintiff after it had been notified by her to stop payment of the check. The case was heard upon an agreed statement of facts which may be summarized as follows:
On April 1, 1946, the plaintiff drew a check on her account for $500.00, payable to Mrs. Joe Radish of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. On the following day, April 2nd, plaintiff telephoned one of the officers or agents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tremont Trust Co. v. BurackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Gaita v. Windsor BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Hodnick v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hiroshima v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Fourth & Central Trust Co. v. RoweOhio Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Reinhardt v. Passaic-Clifton Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Grego v. South Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Haman v. First National Bank in Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.