Legal Opinion
Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided July 16, 1992No. 01-91-1371-CVPublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM BASS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a suit involving multiple causes of action.
We reverse and remand.
The plaintiff is Maranatha Temple, Incorporated (Maranatha). The defendants are Atlantic Richfield Company, Lyondell Petrochemical Company, Conoco, Incorporated, Diamond Shamrock Corporation, Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Company, Dixie Pipeline Company, Dow Chemical Company, Dow Pipeline Company, Enterprise Products Company, Exxon Pipeline Company, Oxy Fractionators, Incorporated, f/k/a Cities Fractionators, Incorporated, Shell Pipeline Corporation,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Renwar Oil Corporation v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Abilene v. Burk Royalty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Lone Star Steel Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Pentagon Enterprises v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Cox Engineering, Inc. v. Funston MacHine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- In Re Masonite Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Yzaguirre v. KCS Resources, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.