Lincoln Properties, Inc. v. Goldslager

Unlike the cases of Glass v. Dryden (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 149, and Schiff v. Columbus (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 31, the plaintiff here presented sufficient evidence at the trial, if believed, to establish that the value of its real estate after the completion of the improvements, the cost of which was partially assessed against the property, was less than its value before the improvements. The *156defendants presented no evidence. Nevertheless, the trial court refused the injunction.

In his opinion, the trial judge appeared to justify his decision on Ms conclusion that a temporary decrease in market…