Snodgrass v. Clark
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Probate Court of Jackson. Tried before Hon. David Tate. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
All the facts which are necessary to show that Mrs. Clark, who was demandant below, is entitled to dower in the lands in controversy, are stated in her petition to the probate judge. The petition also alleges, that she was the widow of Isaac Clark, and that he died “ seized and possessed ” of the lands of which dower is claimed. The tract contained one hundred and ninety-six and 70-100 acres. Nothing is said of alienation by the husband during coverture, nor of improvements on the lands since alienation. But it is stated in the petition, that John Snodgrass, the appellant, claimed said lands,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vincent v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Brooks v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
- Thrasher v. Pinckard's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- King v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Smith v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coosa Portland Cement Co. v. CrankfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Childers v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Sanders v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Snedicor v. MobleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.