Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
No question presented on the former appeal in this cause is here involved, but is cited as containing a general outline of the case. Holmes v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 217 Ala. 333, 116 So. 323.
Upon the second trial, the judgment in defendants’ favor was set aside on plaintiff’s motion and a new trial granted, from which judgment defendants prosecute this appeal.
A careful study of the record is persuasive to our minds that the trial court’s ruling in awarding a new trial was rested upon his action in giving for defendants the two charges which constitute grounds 16 and 20 of the motion.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- St. Louis & O'Fallon Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Ingard v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Blakeney v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Nichols v. Seaboard Coastline Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Weekley v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.