Legal Opinion

Childers v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 8 Div. 452PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is a suit by A. B. Holmes against E. H. Childers and E. D. Wright on a promissory note, waiving exemptions as to personal property, and agreeing to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee for collecting it. A non est factum plea was filed by each defendant. The case was tried on that issue alone. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants, and from the judgment for plaintiff, rendered thereon by the court, each defendant appeals.

The witness Patterson testified he knew E. H. Wright, had seen him execute papers, saw him sign his name, but he always did it by making a mark. The court very…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Upson v. RaifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. McGhee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Highsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API