Legal Opinion

Westar Energy, Inc. v. Wittig

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 9, 2010No. 102,579PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Introduction

This appeal involves a declaratory judgment action between a corporation and one of its former officers. Westar Energy, Inc. agreed to advance attorney fees and expenses reasonably incurred by any of its officers charged with a crime that related to that officer s employment. David C. Wittig, a former officer of Westar, was charged in federal court with crimes arising from his conduct during his time as an officer of Westar. Westar is now responsible for advancing fees and expenses reasonably incurred in Wittig’s defense.

Persuaded by cases from Delaware, an historical…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Kaung v. Cole National Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HeimanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board v. State Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. Iron Mound, LLC v. Nueterra Healthcare Management, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. HV Properties of Kansas, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  5. Ross-Williams v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API