Legal Opinion

Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board v. State Corp. Commission

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2012No. 107,897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Introduction

This is an appeal from the order of the Kansas Corporation Commission, referred to as the Commission in this opinion, granting the inclusion of $4.5 million for consultant and attorney fees as rate case expenses for Kansas City Power and Light Company, commonly called KCP&L, a public utility regulated by the Commission.

In 2005, KCP&L agreed with the Commission and its staff (Staff), along with other interested parties, to provide for the future energy needs of Kansas energy users by making substantial improvements in the company’s capacity to generate and transmit *1114electric…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Driscoll v. Edison Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Cadena v. Pacesetter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hays v. RutherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Bluestem Telephone Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. Consolver v. HotzeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. State Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  5. Consolver v. HotzeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API