Commonwealth v. Clark
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This case is before us upon remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
In our initial examination of the case we addressed two issues presented by the Commonwealth. See: Commonwealth v. Clark, 349 Pa.Super. 255, 502 A.2d 1375 (1985). After reviewing the facts we concluded that the trial court correctly ruled that conversations recorded between Appellee and Commonwealth informant, Richard McCullough had to be suppressed since the consent issued by Mr. McCullough was not voluntary. However because we found the review and authorization requirements of the Wiretapping and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McIvorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. SpenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Com. v. Darr, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Shazad, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.