Legal Opinion
City of New Orleans v. Beck
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 24, 1916No. 21857PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from Second Recorder’s Court of New Orleans; B. T. Tiller, Recorder. F. G. T. Beck was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of New Orleans, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
The defendant was prosecuted for failing to have his premises and grocery rat-proofed, as required by City Ordinance No. 2512, C. C. S.
Defendant moved to quash the charge for the reason that there is no second recorder’s court in the city of. New Orleans, and, if there is, there is no judge therefor. This motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted.
(The motion to quash is not pressed in this court.)
The defendant then entered a demurrer to the affidavit and charge as follows:
“Now comes defendant, through undersigned counsel, and for demurrer to the affidavit and charge herein made against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Health Department v. Rector of Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- City of New Orleans v. SanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- City of New Orleans v. RickerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
3Cited by17 opinions
- Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Chapman v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Meyers v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Tafaro's Investment Co. v. Division of Housing ImprovementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Archer v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.