State v. Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Justice.
On 12 June 2013, the General Assembly enacted legislation that, effective 1 December 2013, made it “unlawful for any person” to “[p]ossess a pseudoephedrine product if the person has a prior conviction for the possession or manufacture of methamphetamine,” with any person convicted of this offense to “be punished as a Class H felon.” Act *659of June 12,2013, ch. 124, secs. 1, 3, 2013 N.C. Sess. Laws 291, 291-93 (codified at N.C.G.S. § 90-95(d1)(1)(c)).1 Prior to the enactment of N.C.G.S. § 90-95(d1)(1)(c), any person aged eighteen or older was entitled to purchase “at retail” up to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BerrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025