Commissioners of Decatur County v. Curry
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is insisted by counsel for the .plaintiffs, that the ordinary of Decatur County alone has authority to lay out a new public road in that county; and that the county commissioners are without power and jurisdiction to do so. We cannot agree with counsel in this cqntention. It is true that § 640 of the Civil Code of 1910 declares, that, “ on application for any new road, the ordinary shall appoint three road commissioners, residing as near where such road is intended to pass as possible; and if they find it of public utility, they must proceed to mark it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fulton County v. AmorousSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Mitchell County v. HudspethSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Barham v. WeemsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Brooke v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Hutchinson v. Lowndes CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Lee County v. Mayor of SmithvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Anderson v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Walker v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.