Legal Opinion
Mellen v. Edwards
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1934No. 25091. En BancPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is an appeal from an order refusing confirmation óf a sheriff’s sale had under a decree of mortgage foreclosure.
It appears that, in March, 1926, respondents Edwards and Mullane, for a valuable consideration, executed and delivered to the appellant their promissory-note for fifteen hundred dollars, with, interest, and secured the payment of the note by executing and delivering the real estate mortgage which was foreclosed in this action. When the note matured according to its terms in March, 1929, three hundred dollars was paid on account of the principal, and the balance was extended for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Matter of Superintendent of BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Rowley v. Van BenthuysenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Tacoma v. McCaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Betz v. Tower Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Williams v. Continental Securities Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- John Davis Estate, Inc. v. RochelleWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Walter G. Brix, Inc. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.