United States v. Mendez-Zamora
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEANELL REECE TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Mario Mendez-Zamora, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to challenge the District Court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. See 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Mendez-ZamoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002