Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendez-Zamora

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2006No. 06-3160Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEANELL REECE TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mario Mendez-Zamora, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to challenge the District Court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. See 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. Mendez-ZamoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API