Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendez-Zamora

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2002No. 01-3062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mario Mendez-Zamora (“Defendant”) was indicted on four counts of a five-count indictment. He entered into an agreement with the government in which he agreed to plead guilty to Count Five of the indictment, which charged him with distribution of 50 grams or more of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. Bonard Ray DeninnoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. CernobylCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Keith NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Mendez-ZamoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API