Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. Hall

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 27, 1993No. 11150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from a stipulated judgment awarding him damages in a personal injury action.1 On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly (1) allowed the workers’ compensation carrier to intervene and (2) forced the plaintiff to trial. We are unable to review this matter because the plaintiff cannot appeal from the stipulated judgment.

“A stipulated judgment allows the parties to avoid litigation by entering into an agreement that will settle their differences once the court renders judgment on the basis of the agreement.” Housing Authority v. Lamothe, 27 Conn. App.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Bryan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Housing Authority v. LamotheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. William G. Major Construction Co. v. DeMichelySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. Housing Authority v. LamotheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bernet v. BernetConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Mulligan v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Mulligan v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API