Legal Opinion

Starzenski v. City of Elkhart

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 10, 1994No. 3:93cv0401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON ABSTENTION ISSUE

ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.

On February 8, 1993, workers for the City of Elkhart (City) came onto plaintiffs’ prop erty at 1015 West Garfield without their permission and without a warrant and began removing the plaintiffs’ personal property from the yard and from within the house. The City had repeatedly given notice of the violations and had ordered Sophie to clean the property or the City would clean it for her. The property removed was hauled to a landfill and dumped.

Gennie and Kazmer Starzenski are eo-owners of the property with Sophie Starzenski.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilbur v. Keybank National Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API