Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Berry
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 7, 2008No. C-07-04431 RMWPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MS. BERRY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Defendant Lisa C. Berry (“Berry”) moves to dismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiff, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC opposes the motion. The court has read the moving and responding papers and considered arguments of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants in part and denies in part Ms. Berry’s motion to dismiss. The SEC is granted 30 days leave to amend the complaint.
I. BACKGROUND
Lisa C. Berry is a lawyer with a masters of law in taxation.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. KearnsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re Reserve Fund Securities & Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Microtune, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.