Legal Opinion
Intermountain Rubber Industries, Inc. v. Valdez
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 1984No. 84CA0168PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZGER, Judge.
Petitioners, Intermountain Rubber Industries, Inc. (Intermountain) and State Compensation Insurance Fund (Fund), seek review of a final order of the Industrial Commission. We affirm in favor of claimant, Rudy Valdez.
Petitioners assert that the Commission erred in its determinations that claimant’s April 2, 1981, petition to reopen was timely filed and constituted a sufficient claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. Relying on § 8-53-106(1) and (3), C.R.S. (1983 Cum.Supp.), claimant argues that petitioners should be precluded from asserting this issue since they failed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Boulder v. PayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Civil Serv. Com'n of C. & C. of Denver v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- R & R Well Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Denver v. HansenColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- States v. RD Werner Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Durango v. DunaganColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Eachus v. CooperColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Renaissance Salon v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Erickson v. OberlohrColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.