Legal Opinion

City of Durango v. Dunagan

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1997No. 96CA0973PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Petitioners, the City of Durango and the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency, seek review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel), which determined that Randy L. Dunagan (claimant) was entitled to medical benefits for a 1991 back injury. We affirm.

I. Causal Relationship

Petitioners first contend that there is no evidence in the record to support a causal relationship between the 1991 back injury suffered by claimant and his disc herniation that was diagnosed in 1995. We disagree.

Claimant’s treating physician opined that the 1991 injury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Boulder v. PayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. May D & F v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Lewis v. Scientific Supply Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Sneath v. Express Messenger ServiceColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Suetrack USA v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Zerba v. Dillon CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. City of Colorado Springs v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Claims OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Cabela v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API