Civil Serv. Com'n of C. & C. of Denver v. District Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This is an original proceeding under C.A.R. 21. Petitioner is the Civil Service Commission of the City and County of Denver. It seeks a writ of prohibition alleging respondent parties failed to timely join indispensable parties under C.R.C.P. 106(b). We issued a rule to show cause why the court should not be prohibited from proceeding further. We make the rule absolute.
I
This and other actions have run the gamut in district court and the Court of Appeals since 1969, when the Civil Service Commission (hereinafter “the Commission”) held an examination for the rank of sergeant in the Denver…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hidden Lake Development Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Civil Serv. Com'n v. District Ct. in & for Cty. of AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Hennigh v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Spickard v. CIVIL SERV. COM'N OF CITY & CTY. OF DENVERColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Clasby v. KlapperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Colorado Water Quality Control Commission v. Town of FrederickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- City and County of Denver v. DISTRICT COURT OF SECOND DISTRICTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Gold Star Sausage Co. v. KempfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.