Legal Opinion

Day v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1952No. 25,851Published

1Opinion

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The trial court erred in his instructions to the jury concerning the testimony of the accomplice witness. This charge reads:

“I instruct you that the witness J. W. Whitton is an accomplice.
“Now, you are instructed that you cannot convict the defendant upon the testimony of said J. W. Whitton alone, unless *618you first believe that his testimony is true, and connects the defendant with the offense charged, and then you cannot convict the defendant upon said testimony unless you further believe that there is other testimony in the case,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Standfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Stovall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API