Legal Opinion

Nance v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1977No. 10360PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol without a license 1 after a trial upon stipulated facts which were developed at the pretrial hearing on his motion to suppress the pistol. Appellant challenges the trial judge’s denial of his suppression motion; he argues that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him, thereby invalidating the subsequent search which revealed the pistol concealed on his person.

At the suppression hearing the prosecution elicited the following testimony from Sergeant Ware, one of the arresting officers:

Q. Would you tell us the circumstances…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rushing v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Goldston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Rutledge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Henighan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API