Legal Opinion

Rushing v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1977No. 11458, 11538PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

In a prosecution for the possession of narcotics, defendants Rushing and Childs moved to suppress evidence obtained in the course of an allegedly illegal search and arrest. The sole witness at the hearing on the motion was Officer Cicioni who testified as follows. A woman who had furnished the police drug information before, but whose identity Cicioni did not know, called to say that two men, one of whom was wearing a white T-shirt, were selling narcotics at a specified location. A radio dispatcher, whose identity Cicioni also did not know, passed this information on to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. People v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Cauthen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API