Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1978No. 12284PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

Police officers arrested appellant on the basis of an informant’s tip that he was selling narcotics. Appellant contends that the motions judge erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of a Preludin tablet seized incident to the arrest. We conclude that the arresting officers did not have a sufficient basis supporting their informant’s credibility to satisfy the “veracity" prong of the Aguilar-Spinelli test for informant-based probable cause determinations. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying suppression of the narcotics evidence.

I. The Facts; Trial Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. MoonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. People v. WintersIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Goldston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API