Hornthal v. . Howcott
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from J. 8. Adams, J., at Fall Term, 1910, of "WASHINGTON. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Allen.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
This action was instituted to determine the title to certain pine and poplar timber standing on the land de scribed in tbe complaint. Tbe plaintiffs are L. H. Horntbal and Flora Sbeleeman, wbo is tbe only beir at law of Louis Horntbal, deceased. It appears from tbe record that prior to 5 May, 1900, L. H. and Louis Horntbal were tbe owners of said land, and that on tbat day tbey executed to tbe John L. Roper Lumber Company a deed by wbicb tbey conveyed all tbe pine and poplar timber on said land, not less than 11 inches on tbe stump when cut, with tbe right to enter and to cut and remove said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Hawkins v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Lumber Co. v. Corey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Strasson v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Mining Co. v. . Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
3Cited by39 opinions
- Perry v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Carolina Timber Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Williams v. . ParsonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Martin v. Southern Pine Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Fowle v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.