Legal Opinion
Canton Industrial Corp. v. Mi-Jack Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided July 8, 1996No. 95-C-0651-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SAM, District Judge.
Before the court are: (1) the motion of defendants Mi-Jack Products, Inc., MJMC, Inc., and Lanco International, Inc. to dismiss the amended complaint; and (2) the motion of plaintiff Canton Industrial Corporation to strike points I and II of defendants’ reply memorandum in support of them motion to dismiss. The court, having reviewed the memoranda submitted by the parties, will rule on the motions without the assistance of oral argument, pursuant to D.Ut. 202(d).
BACKGROUND
The following facts have been gleaned from the amended complaint and the parties’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anne P. Henry v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Matao C. Yokeno v. Ramon C. MafnasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Amoco Rocmount Co. v. Anschutz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Prudential Oil Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Anschutz Corp. v. Amoco Rocmount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. v. NRT Mid-Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Hytken Family Ltd. v. SchaeferDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Reinhart Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Excel Directional Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006