Legal Opinion

Chouteau v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court, Hon. Francis M. Black, Judge. ' The case is stated in the opinion. I. Section 809, Revised Statutes, does not require fences to be built between the tracks of the Wabash Railway Company and those of defendant. The phraseology of the section showg it was not intended to apply to-the station grounds of a railroad company. Edioards v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 671; Morris ». Railroad, 79 Mo. 370;. McIntosh o. Railroad, 26- Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court, Hon. Francis M. Black, Judge. ' The case is stated in the opinion. I. Section 809, Revised Statutes, does not require fences to be built between the tracks of the Wabash Railway Company and those of defendant. The phraseology of the section showg it was not intended to apply to-the station grounds of a railroad company. Edioards v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 671; Morris ». Railroad, 79 Mo. 370;. McIntosh o. Railroad, 26- Mo. App. 362; Cousin7s case, 66 Mo. 572. II. Said section 2124 supplements section 809, and applies wherever section 809 is inapplicable. The…

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

Plaintiff sues for the loss of a cow killed by defendant’s cars. He asked and obtained double damages under section 809, Revised Statutes, and defendant appeals. The allegation was, and the proof showed, the cow strayed upon defendant’s track where it was unfenced, and not at a public crossing, nor within the limits of an incorporated city or town, but at a point where the road runs through unenclosed lands. But defendant seeks a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the tracks were used for passing trains, for switch*560ing, for storing cars, and for transferring through freight; also,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morris v. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Russell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Russell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Bridges v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Green v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Wright v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Prather v. Kansas City & Northern Connecting RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API