Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. University Physicians Clinic

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2006No. 23652PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Tom and Laura Kaiser (Kaisers) brought a medical malpractice action against University Physicians Clinic and Elizabeth Dimitrievieh, M.D. (Defendants). A jury verdict was rendered in favor of Defendants. Kaisers appeal contending the circuit court erred when it admitted a previously undisclosed exhibit into evidence, allowed the use of two other previously undisclosed exhibits for illustrative purposes, and ruled that Defendants’ expert witness could testify about the exhibits to the jury. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Laura…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Dicky D. Voegeli and Sharon Voegeli v. Harvard R. Lewis and Methodist Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. St. John v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Veith v. O'BRIENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API