State v. Wilkins
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a criminal sentencing case. We conclude that the trial court improperly required the defendant, who had pleaded guilty, to testify for the prosecution at sentencing concerning matters beyond the facts of the case and concerning matters beyond what was necessary at the plea hearing to establish that the defendant pleaded guilty freely and voluntarily. We also conclude that the trial court improperly required the defendant’s personal psychiatrist to testify at the sentencing hearing, invading privileged communications with the defendant. Therefore, we vacate the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lanza v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MunnTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Steven Gene ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hoskins v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.