Legal Opinion
State v. Munn
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 2001PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.
in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ„ joined.
We granted this appeal to determine the following issues: (1) whether the secret police videotaping of the defendant’s conversations, while alone with his parents in a police interview room, violated the defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, article I, § 7 of the Tennessee Constitution, and the federal and state wiretapping statutes; (2) whether the defendant’s Miranda rights were violated; (3) whether later confessions made by the defendant should have been suppressed under the…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by53 opinions
- State v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- R.D.S. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.