Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronnie Appawoo and Gerald Mountainlion, United States of America v. Ernest Rabbit Casey

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1977No. 76-1024, 76-1056PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The Government has taken these appeals from the granting of motions for acquittal entered by Judge Ritter in the United States District Court for the District of Utah.

I

In United States v. Casey, No. 76-1056, an information was filed against the defendant, an American Indian, charging an assault with deadly weapons resulting in serious injury of another Indian in Indian country in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153. 18 U.S.C. § 1153 provides that such an assault shall be defined and punished in accordance with state law. Defendant asserted, and by motion sought to have the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Rafael A. UrenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. J. Milton RichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. KnittelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API