Legal Opinion

Marks Hat Co. v. Slatnik

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Gomrt. — William S. Ayres, Judge. Action on an account.- The defendant pleaded overcharges..and failure to allow discounts, by way of a set-off. The verdict was for plaintiff for much less than claimed, and from judgment thereon, it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

*3721' cai«iha?l:0transfer of causes: equity accounting. *371I. The petition alleged, on and between June 21, 1912, and July 28, 193 3, the sale of merchandise, set out in *372an itemized account attached thereto, amounting to $21,382.80, on which payments are credited totaling $16,-688.68, leaving a balance of $4,694.32, for which judgment was demanded. The defendant admitted that all the items had been purchased by him and that all payments had been credited, but alleged that, in December, 1909, he entered into an oral agreement with plaintiff, by the terms of which, the latter undertook to furnish…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hollenbeck v. RistineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. McMartin v. BinghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  3. Piper v. FletcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. White v. HamptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berry Seed Company v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Williams v. HerringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Fleener v. NugentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Richman v. RichmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API