Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Adai/r Circuit Court. The plaintiff procured a judgment against one Harshaw, and caused the defendants to be garnished as his debtors. The answers of the garnishees were controverted by the plaintiff, and there was a trial before a jury. The court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendants, which they did, and judgment was rendered thereon. The piaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
1» PRACTICE in supreme court: demnedfor1' prolixity. We have before us in this case what is intended to be an abstract. It contains two hundred and twenty-eight pages of printed matter. The quest _ _ , tions propounded to the witnesses and answers A theret:o are set out iu Tull, and also the arguments 0f counsel, and what was said by the court in relation to the admission of evidence when objections thereto were made.
Two invoices of the same stock of goods are set out at length, showing all the various articles composing the stock. In addition to this, the writs of attachment and service…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Watrous v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Marienthal, Lehman & Co. v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ShedoudyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Pennypacker v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Union Mercantile Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Ackerman v. C. C. Chapell Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.