Legal Opinion

Koehler v. Pulvers

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 9, 1985No. Civ. 82-1076-EPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENRIGHT, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs filed this action on August 25, 1982, alleging on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated registration violations and misrepresentations in the sale of securities in the Twenty-One Thirty-One limited partnership (“21-31 Ltd.”). The developer defendants formed this partnership to own and develop real property consisting of an office building and adjacent lots situated at 2131 Third Avenue, San Diego, California, including Lots A-D inclusive, of block 246, and Lots H, I, and J of block 247, Horton’s Addition.

Three types of security…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michael P. Lewis v. David M. Fresne Lowell Farkas Robert A. Young Rosenfeld, Bernstein & Tannenhauser LLP Eric P. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Stitt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Lubin v. Sybedon Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API