Legal Opinion
McWithy v. Heart River School District No. 22
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1948No. File 7090PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GeimsoN, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action for a balance she claims due under a contract with the defendant school district. The contract is admitted. It provided that the plaintiff should teach a school in said district for a term of eight months beginning September 11, 1944, at a salary of $125.00 per month. It further provided that the school might be discontinued at any time in accordance with § 15-2509 ND Rev Code 1943, which provides, in part, that “school may be discontinued when the average attendance of pupils therein shall be less than sis for ten consecutive days, .…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Frost v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Barthel v. Bd. of Educ. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hull v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- E. E. E., Inc. v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Fargo Foods, Inc. v. BernabucciNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Ray Co., Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.