Johnson v. Sandy City Corporation
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Defendant Sandy City appeals from a judgment of the district court which declares void a purported annexation of lands contiguous to its western boundary.
Plaintiff Mabel Johnson initiated this proceeding (which she characterized as quo warranto)1 seeking an adjudication that the purported annexation of four tracts of land lying west of Sandy City was void because it had not been done in compliance with the law. The parties agreed to limit the proceedings to one tract, upon the assumption that the adjudication would be the same as .to all four.
Under our law cities and towns…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ritholz v. City of Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Salt Lake City v. ReveneUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- Incorporated Town of Windsor Heights v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Leavell v. Town of TexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Jensen v. Bountiful CityUtah Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wheeler v. McPhersonUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Call v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Port Valdez Company, Inc. v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Grandote Golf & Country Club, LLC v. Town of La VetaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.