Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Holleman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1943No. 6 Div. 28PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action is for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an automobile collision on a public street in Birmingham.

Count 1 of the complaint, upon which the trial was had, as first amended, charged that the defendant, Robert I. Ingalls, Jr., negligently caused or allowed said automobile, of which he was in charge or control, to run into or against the automobile in which plaintiff was riding, and as a proximate consequence of said negligence of defendant, plaintiff suffered said injuries. The evidence throughout disclosed defendant was not personally present in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Futvoye v. ChuitesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Collum v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Hanye v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Carter v. ShugarmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Foster & Creighton Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Alabama Gas Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Kay-Noojin Development Co. v. KinzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Ex Parte General Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API