Legal Opinion

Carter v. Shugarman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 16, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Heard before Hon. John. C. Pugh. Action by Mrs. Sol Shugarman against R. H. Carter and others, for damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, J.(1) The complaint charges that defendants’ servants in charge of the automobile, acting within the line and scope of their authority, “so carelessly and negligently operated and controlled the said automobile as to cause the same to run violently into, upon, or against the buggy in which plaintiff was riding, and as a proximate consequence thereof the plaintiff was thrown from the said buggy,” etc., and injured.

This language sufficiently shows the causal connection between the negligent act of defendants and the injury suffered by plaintiff and the demurrers were properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States H. & A. Ins. v. GoinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. McGhee & Fink v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Winter & Loeb v. PoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kurn v. CountsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Courtesy Ford Sales, Inc. v. FarriorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Watkins v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API