Legal Opinion

Foster & Creighton Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1956No. 6 Div. 567PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was filed by St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company for its benefit and for the benefit of Mrs. June Fulton Robinson and her minor son, dependents of Robert Harold Robinson, Sr., deceased, against Foster & Creighton Company and others, under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Title 26, § 312, Code of Alabama 1940, as amended. The complaint was in one count and alleged that Robert Harold Robinson; Sr., died as the result of injuries sustained in a fall through an opening in the third floor of the Phoenix Building Annex on July 27, 1950, due to the negligence of Foster &…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Thomas v. BuchananIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dukeman v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ziraldo v. W. J. Lynch Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. MosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Baptist Medical Center v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Trimble v. Bramco Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. F. W. Woolworth Company v. BradburySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API