Legal Opinion
Max Arnold & Sons, LLC v. W.L. Hailey & Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 22, 2006No. 05-5893PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant W.L. Hailey & Co., Inc. appeals the March 9, 2005 order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee denying Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting Plaintiff Max Arnold & Sons, LLC’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs claim of breach of contract. For the following reasons, we REVERSE the district court’s grant of Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, AFFIRM the district court’s partial grant of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and partial denial of the same motion, 1 and REMAND the case for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Todd Bates v. Green Farms Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Nathaniel Brent v. Wayne Cty. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Sensations, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.