Oneonta Light & Power Co. v. Schwarzenbach
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant Arthur Schwarzenbach from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Otsego Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Otsego on the 26th day of November, 1913, confirming the report of commissioners of appraisal herein, with notice of an intention to bring up for review an interlocutory judgment entered in said clerk’s office on the 24th day of February, 1913, and all proceedings antecedent or subsequent thereto, except the…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant Arthur Schwarzenbach from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Otsego Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Otsego on the 26th day of November, 1913, confirming the report of commissioners of appraisal herein, with notice of an intention to bring up for review an interlocutory judgment entered in said clerk’s office on the 24th day of February, 1913, and all proceedings antecedent or subsequent thereto, except the proceedings before the commissioners in appraising the defendants’ damages. Appeal by the plaintiff, Oneonta Light and…
1Opinion of the Court
Lyon, J.:
This proceeding was instituted by the plaintiff, which is the owner of and engaged in operating an electric plant by both water and steam power, situate in the town of Oneonta, Otsego county, N. Y., to condemn the right to overflow three and eighty-seven one-hundredths acres of land, a portion of which is now covered by the water of plaintiff’s dam, The final order appealed from by the defendant confirmed the report of commissioners appointed to ascertain the compensation to be made therefor to the defendant Arthur Schwarzenbach who is the owner thereof, but awarded the costs of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Matter of City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- The People v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- In Matter of N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Erie v. . FridenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Alfred Vail Mutual Ass'n v. Borough of New ShrewsburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Boland v. BeebeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Murray v. LaGuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.