Legal Opinion

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

Taking a broad view of the matter, no compelling reason appears why the city may not condemn the portion of the right of way involved. While a few courts have held that a municipality has no right to’ condemn railroad right of way longitudinally for street purposes, this court has never so ruled. If a proposed street extension may cross a railroad, it would seem that when necessity therefor exists it may be permitted to pass over a portion of a railroad right of way on which no track lies or struc*173ture stands. The city does not take the land; it only takes a public right of way over it; and if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Samish River Boom Co. v. Union Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Baltzell v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wisconsin Water Co. v. WinansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Smith v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lord v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1975
  4. (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API