Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Racine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
Taking a broad view of the matter, no compelling reason appears why the city may not condemn the portion of the right of way involved. While a few courts have held that a municipality has no right to’ condemn railroad right of way longitudinally for street purposes, this court has never so ruled. If a proposed street extension may cross a railroad, it would seem that when necessity therefor exists it may be permitted to pass over a portion of a railroad right of way on which no track lies or struc*173ture stands. The city does not take the land; it only takes a public right of way over it; and if…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Samish River Boom Co. v. Union Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Baltzell v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Wisconsin Water Co. v. WinansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Lord v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1975
- (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973