Alfred Vail Mutual Ass'n v. Borough of New Shrewsbury
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Schettino, J.
We are here concerned with the validity of the current method of apportioning regional school costs between the constituent municipalities of the Tinton Falls Regional Elementary School District, the Township of Shrewsbury [hereinafter the Township] and the Borough of New Shrewsbury [hereinafter the Borough],
Due to the fact that the Borough of Eatontown School District and the Tinton Falls Regional Elementary School District together comprise the Monmouth Regional High School District, these municipalities divide the latter’s proportionate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Owens v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Jack v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McKenney v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Township of Willingboro v. Burlington County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- City of Jersey City v. FarmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.