Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Caldwell Transportation Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1989No. 17081Published

1Opinion of the Court

779 P.2d 395 (1989)

116 Idaho 720

Gary E. SPRAGUE, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

CALDWELL TRANSPORTATION INC., Employer, and

Aetna Casualty & Surety, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 17081.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 12, 1989.

On Denial of Rehearing September 7, 1989.

Gigray, Miller, Downen, Weston & Pasley, Caldwell, for appellant. William F. Gigray III, argued.

Imhoff & Lynch, Boise, for respondents. Thomas P. Baskin III, argued.

BISTLINE, Justice.

The Commission concluded that claimant's medical treatment occurring subsequent to April 10, 1985, was not "reasonable," and therefore the surety was not…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Curtis v. Shoshone County Sheriff's OfficeIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hattenburg v. BlanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API