Legal Opinion

Ruane v. Jancsics

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 30, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wheatley, PJ.

The plaintiff (Ruane), alleging breach of contract against both defendants (mother and son) and fraud against Ms. Jancsics, sued for payment on a promissory note (the note), payable on demand. After a hearing, the trial judge allowed Ruane’s motion for summary judgment for $17,715 plus interest and costs, from which judgment the defendants appealed pursuant to Dist/Mun. Cts. R. A D. A, Rule 8C. We affirm the judgment

“Summary judgment shall he granted where there are no genuine issues as to any material fact and where the moving parly is entitled to judgment as matter of law.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Coveney v. President & Trustees of the College of the Holy CrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Bergendahl v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Muldoon v. LaChance Financial Services, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API