Legal Opinion

Farley v. Ventresco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1931No. Appeal 65PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained by him as the result of a collision of the automobile which he was driving with an automobile crane of the defendant which was parked on the side of Frankford Avenue, a eity street. Frankford Avenue runs north and south and has a forty-four foot cartway with two lines of ear tracks occupying the middle portion thereof. It is intersected by Cheltenham Avenue. There is a bend in Frankford Avenue north of Cheltenham Avenue, but from the south side of the latter avenue Frankford…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Mason v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Filer v. FilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Cupples, Jr. v. YearickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. McGrath v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dalley v. Mid-Western Dairy Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Milliken v. United LaundriesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Cervinka v. Horlacher Delivery ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API